Show:
Extends
Methods
subpipelineUnnecessary()
Can/should content represented in 'toks' be processed in its own DOM scope?
- No reason to spin up a new pipeline for plain text
- In some cases, if templates need not be nested entirely within the boundary of the token, we cannot process the contents in a new scope.
Can/should content represented in 'toks' be processed in its own DOM scope?
- No reason to spin up a new pipeline for plain text
- In some cases, if templates need not be nested entirely within the boundary of the token, we cannot process the contents in a new scope.
- Source: